[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1227778377.4454.1299.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:32:57 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] fs: Introduce a per_cpu nr_inodes
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 00:32 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Avoids cache line ping pongs between cpus and prepare next patch,
> because updates of nr_inodes metric dont need inode_lock anymore.
>
> (socket8 bench result : 25s to 20.5s)
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
> ---
> @@ -96,9 +96,40 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(iprune_mutex);
> * Statistics gathering..
> */
> struct inodes_stat_t inodes_stat;
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, nr_inodes);
>
> static struct kmem_cache * inode_cachep __read_mostly;
>
> +int get_nr_inodes(void)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> + int counter = 0;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + counter += per_cpu(nr_inodes, cpu);
> + if (counter < 0)
> + counter = 0;
> + return counter;
> +}
It would be good to get a cpu hotplug handler here and move to
for_each_online_cpu(). People are wanting distro's to be build with
NR_CPUS=4096.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists