linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] fs: Introduce a per_cpu nr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:48:49 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] fs: Introduce a per_cpu nr_inodes

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:39:31AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> With it being called from writeback that might not be true for all
> workloads. One thing you can do about it is use the regular per-cpu
> counter stuff, which allows you to do an approximation of the global
> number (it also does all the hotplug stuff for you already).

The way it's used in writeback is utterly stupid and should be fixed :)

But otherwise agreed.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/