| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20081128190800.GB29909@x200.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 22:08:00 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched: move double_unlock_balance() higher
Move double_lock_balance()/double_unlock_balance() higher to fix the following
with gcc-3.4.6:
CC kernel/sched.o
In file included from kernel/sched.c:1605:
kernel/sched_rt.c: In function `find_lock_lowest_rq':
kernel/sched_rt.c:914: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'double_unlock_balance': function body not available
kernel/sched_rt.c:1077: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
make[2]: *** [kernel/sched.o] Error 1
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
---
kernel/sched.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
kernel/sched_rt.c | 4 ---
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1588,6 +1588,39 @@ static inline void update_shares_locked(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd)
#endif
+/*
+ * double_lock_balance - lock the busiest runqueue, this_rq is locked already.
+ */
+static int double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest)
+ __releases(this_rq->lock)
+ __acquires(busiest->lock)
+ __acquires(this_rq->lock)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (unlikely(!irqs_disabled())) {
+ /* printk() doesn't work good under rq->lock */
+ spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
+ BUG_ON(1);
+ }
+ if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(&busiest->lock))) {
+ if (busiest < this_rq) {
+ spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
+ spin_lock(&busiest->lock);
+ spin_lock_nested(&this_rq->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+ ret = 1;
+ } else
+ spin_lock_nested(&busiest->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static inline void double_unlock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest)
+ __releases(busiest->lock)
+{
+ spin_unlock(&busiest->lock);
+ lock_set_subclass(&this_rq->lock.dep_map, 0, _RET_IP_);
+}
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
@@ -2788,40 +2821,6 @@ static void double_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq1, struct rq *rq2)
}
/*
- * double_lock_balance - lock the busiest runqueue, this_rq is locked already.
- */
-static int double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest)
- __releases(this_rq->lock)
- __acquires(busiest->lock)
- __acquires(this_rq->lock)
-{
- int ret = 0;
-
- if (unlikely(!irqs_disabled())) {
- /* printk() doesn't work good under rq->lock */
- spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
- BUG_ON(1);
- }
- if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(&busiest->lock))) {
- if (busiest < this_rq) {
- spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
- spin_lock(&busiest->lock);
- spin_lock_nested(&this_rq->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
- ret = 1;
- } else
- spin_lock_nested(&busiest->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
- }
- return ret;
-}
-
-static inline void double_unlock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest)
- __releases(busiest->lock)
-{
- spin_unlock(&busiest->lock);
- lock_set_subclass(&this_rq->lock.dep_map, 0, _RET_IP_);
-}
-
-/*
* If dest_cpu is allowed for this process, migrate the task to it.
* This is accomplished by forcing the cpu_allowed mask to only
* allow dest_cpu, which will force the cpu onto dest_cpu. Then
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -909,10 +909,6 @@ static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
/* Only try algorithms three times */
#define RT_MAX_TRIES 3
-static int double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest);
-static inline void double_unlock_balance(struct rq *this_rq,
- struct rq *busiest);
-
static void deactivate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep);
static int pick_rt_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists