linux-kernel - drivers/x86 (Was: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 28 (misc/tc1100))

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081129083550.3c23af37.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:35:50 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: drivers/x86 (Was: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 28
 (misc/tc1100))

Hi Len,

On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:55:08 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target `drivers/misc/tc1100-wmi.o', needed by `drivers/misc/built-in.o'.
> 
> on allmodconfig & allyesconfig for i386.
> 
> On, moved to drivers/x86/.  Someone needs to clean up drivers/misc/Makefile.

Just wondering where the move to drivers/x86 was discussed, (reviewed and
tested) and why the change is in the acpi tree and not the x86 tree?

I am not saying it should not be done (I haven't looked enough to have an
opinion).
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped