[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081129222449.e341f028.h.mitake@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:24:49 +0900
From: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@...il.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Doug Thompson <norsk5@...oo.com>, dougthompson@...ssion.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] edac x38: new MC driver module
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:52:29 +0100
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> >
> > But this is old way. ARCH_HAS_READQ and ARCH_HAS_WRITEQ are new ways
> > to determine existence of readq/writeq. Drivers which use readq/writeq should
> > depend on these values in their Kconfig file.
>
> If we look at arch/x86/Kconfig we see:
> ### Arch settings
> config X86
> def_bool y
> select HAVE_AOUT if X86_32
> select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
> select HAVE_IDE
> select HAVE_OPROFILE
> select HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT
> select HAVE_KPROBES
> select ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB
> ...
>
> So the normal syntax here is "HAVE_XXX_XXX" - not ARCH_HAS_XXX_XXX
>
> If you update your patch please use this syntax,
> and locate the select under X86 - not under the 32/64 entries.
Thanks for your notification. I didn't notice that syntax rule.
>
> But I do not see why adding these in the first place.
>
Andrew Morton told that drivers which need readq/writeq should use ones of kernel,
and if architecture part of kernel does not provide readq/writeq, drivers should be disabled.
This is Andrew's mail:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122625885124798&w=2
===> Quote:
#ifdef readq
Is a suitable way of determining whether the architecture implements
readq and writeq. It isn't pretty, but it will suffice.
A problem with it is that drivers will then do
#ifndef readq
<provide a local implementation here>
#endif
which rather sucks - we don't want lots of little private readq/writeq
implementations all over the tree.
Perhaps it would be better to have a CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_READQ and to then
disable these drivers on the architectures which don't provide
readq/writeq support.
<====
This is new patch.
description of this patch
Adding implementation of readq/writeq to x86_32,
and adding config value to x86 architecture to determine existence of readq/writeq
Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@...il.com>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 ++
arch/x86/include/asm/io.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index ac22bb7..75408fe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ config X86
select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
select HAVE_GENERIC_DMA_COHERENT if X86_32
select HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
+ select HAVE_READQ
+ select HAVE_WRITEQ
config ARCH_DEFCONFIG
string
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/io.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/io.h
index ac2abc8..ddc67aa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/io.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/io.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#define ARCH_HAS_IOREMAP_WC
#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <asm-generic/int-ll64.h>
#define build_mmio_read(name, size, type, reg, barrier) \
static inline type name(const volatile void __iomem *addr) \
@@ -57,6 +58,29 @@ build_mmio_write(__writeq, "q", unsigned long, "r", )
/* Let people know we have them */
#define readq readq
#define writeq writeq
+
+#else /* CONFIG_X86_32 from here */
+
+static inline __u64 readq(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
+{
+ const volatile u32 __iomem *p = addr;
+ u32 l, h;
+
+ l = readl(p);
+ h = readl(p+1);
+
+ return l + ((u64)h << 32);
+}
+
+static inline void writeq(__u64 val, volatile void __iomem *addr)
+{
+ writel(val, addr);
+ writel(val >> 32, addr+4);
+}
+
+#define readq readq
+#define writeq writeq
+
#endif
extern int iommu_bio_merge;
--
1.5.6.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists