[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081129141945.GA10639@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:19:45 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/function-graph-tracer: adjustments of the
trace informations
* Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> > Another thing that would be nice is to separate out the "cpu)"
> > printing bits into a helper function. Right now what exists cannot be
> > used in a seq-manner, so i couldnt reuse it.
> >
>
> Isn't it the case with print_graph_cpu() ?
yeah, that should be okay. I didnt use it in verif_pid() because it
returns print_line_t - but i guess it would be better to fix verif_pid()
to check for !ret instead of the ret += thing i added.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists