linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] relatime: Allow making relatime the default behaviour

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081129190245.GA21502@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:02:45 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To:	Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
Cc:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...hat.com, val.henson@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] relatime: Allow making relatime the default behaviour

On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 06:56:45PM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> I don't see why there is an objection to per-mountpoint.
> Andrew Morton's syntax: mount /dev/foo /mnt/bar -o relatime=86400
> looks natural to me.

If somebody feels that this functionality would be useful, they're 
welcome to write it. A global default doesn't preclude per-mountpoint 
settings. This patch makes the existing kernel code more useful and so 
is worthwhile on its own, even if it doesn't scratch everyone's itch.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/