[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081129125529.0198e973@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:55:29 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, val.henson@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] relatime: Allow making relatime the default
behaviour
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:32:20 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> The standard, usual, expected way of modifying a filesystem's
> behaviour is via mount options. This is also quite flexible.
>
> Is there some extraordinary reason why the standard interface is not
> to be used here?
let me ask this:
Has anmyone ever had the desire to change the default of 1 day of
relatime? Ever?
Maybe this code isn't really needed if nobody even thought about
changing it.
Clearly there are two extremes (always and never) for which we have
atime/noatime. I'm not sure we need to have any smarts in the middle
point for the user to change. If this is something people wish to see
tuned better, I would rather spend the code size in trying to get it
autotuning.
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists