[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4930F82B.7030906@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:07:07 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] fs: Scalability of sockets/pipes allocation/deallocation
on SMP
Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:47:56PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> Wow, that's incredibly impressive! :-)
>> Yeah, we got a similar speedup on -rt by pushing those super-block files
>> list into per-cpu lists and doing crazy locking on them.
>>
>> Of course avoiding them all together, like done here is a nicer option
>> but is sadly not a possibility for regular files (until hch gets around
>> to removing the need for the list).
>
> We should have finished this long ago, thanks for the reminder.
>
>
inode_in_use could be percpu, at least.
Or just zap it, since we never have to scan it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists