[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081129091647.GA25109@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:16:47 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/branch-tracer: include missing irqflags.h
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> Impact: fix build error on branch tracer
>
> This should fix a build error reported on alpha in linux-next:
>
> CC kernel/trace/trace_branch.o
> kernel/trace/trace_branch.c: In function 'probe_likely_condition':
> kernel/trace/trace_branch.c:44: error: implicit declaration of function 'raw_local_irq_save'
> kernel/trace/trace_branch.c:76: error: implicit declaration of function 'raw_local_irq_restore'
applied to tip/tracing
> Unfortunately, I can't test it since I don't have any Alpha build
> environment.
it does not trigger with an Alpha defconfig - we do test that.
And the thing is, lockdep (which introduced irqflags tracing) has been
introduced upstream two years ago - and Alpha still does not have it
implemented. The architecture should be marked CONFIG_BROKEN if it
continues to cause problems like this.
Alexey, you seem to be using and relying on the Alpha architecture, could
you please have a shot at this and implement the missing irqflags
infrastructure? Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists