lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:03:19 -0500 (EST)
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
	Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, fabio.comolli@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Re: Linux 2.6.28-rc1] ACPI Warning (nspredef-0852)[...]


> The underlying issue is we've never reported such BIOS bugs before and now we
> do that unconditionally.  IMnshO, this should only be done if ACPI debugging is
> enabled.
> 
> While I can see a value in doing that always, IMO such a change should only be
> made after a big announcement.

I agree that we were aggressive in shipping this checking in 2.6.28-rc.

The checking has no functional effect, except to issue a console warning,
so I figured it had limited down-side.

It actually paid off almost immediately by pointing out why
a Linux bug was provoked on jejb's test box.

I had figured on making it CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG for the
final release, but at this point we've seen only the
_BIF and _WAK warnings -- and they're both dealt with
via the patches queued for Linus.

So at this point, I'm inclined to keep this checking enabled in
2.6.28-final, independent of CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG.

-Len



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ