[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081130150849.8140.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:30:51 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mel@....ul.ie
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: bail out of page reclaim after swap_cluster_max pages
> Reclaiming is very easy when the workload is just page cache,
> because the application will be throttled when too many page
> cache pages are dirty.
>
> When using mmap or memory hogs writing to swap, applications
> will not be throttled by the "too many dirty pages" logic,
> but may instead end up being throttled in the direct reclaim
> path instead.
>
> At that point direct reclaim may become a lot more common,
> making the imbalance more significant.
fair enough.
> I'll run a few tests.
Great.
I'm looking for your mail :)
> > Andrew, I hope add this mesurement result to rvr bailing out patch description too.
>
> So far the performance numbers you have measured are very
> encouraging and do indeed suggest that the priority==DEF_PRIORITY
> thing does not make a difference.
thank you.
I believe reclaim latency reducing doesn't only improve hpc, but also
improve several multimedia and desktop application.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists