[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1228041219.9176.10.camel@violet.holtmann.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 11:33:39 +0100
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@...l.com>
Subject: Re: Dell Wireless 365 requires reset quirk
Hi Tim,
> >> >From 931ccb629d739aa563347a4e866bc26107e6b545 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
> >> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 09:18:06 -0700
> >> Subject: [PATCH] Dell Wireless 365 needs BTUSB_RESET quirk.
> >> OriginalAuthor: Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@...l.com>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
> >> Cc: stable@...nel.org
> >> ---
> >> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 3 +++
> >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> >> index af472e0..051b758 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> >> @@ -125,6 +125,9 @@ static struct usb_device_id blacklist_table[] = {
> >> /* Dell laptop with Broadcom chip */
> >> { USB_DEVICE(0x413c, 0x8126), .driver_info = BTUSB_RESET | BTUSB_WRONG_SCO_MTU },
> >>
> >> + /* Dell Wireless 365 */
> >> + { USB_DEVICE(0x413c, 0x8160), .driver_info = BTUSB_RESET },
> >> +
> >> /* Dell Wireless 370 */
> >> { USB_DEVICE(0x413c, 0x8156), .driver_info = BTUSB_RESET | BTUSB_WRONG_SCO_MTU },
> >>
> >
> > I shall assume that this patch was authored by Mario. This should have
> > been communicated by adding his From: line right at the top of the
> > changelog. Mario's signed-off-by: is absent, but that is tolerable
> > because we have yours.
> >
> > The (absent) changelog fails to explain what effect this patch has.
> > _why_ does this driver need this quirk?
> >
> > As it stands, there is insufficient information here for making
> > 2.6.28-vs-2.6.29 decisions, let alone 2.6.27.x, 2.6.26.x, etc.
> >
>
> Is this better (aside from being an attachment) ?
the patch will no longer be needed. I am making HCI Reset the default
and only letting the old drivers quirk a NO_RESET.
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists