[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081201105956.GC28971@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:59:56 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
Cc: ltt-dev@...ts.casi.polymtl.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ltt-dev] keypad/touchscreen driver events latencies using LTTng on ARM?
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 05:57:37AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Ok, so for LTTng on ARM it would make sense to use the same clock source
> as sched_clock for :
> mach-pxa, mach-realview, mach-sa1100, mach-versatile, plat-omap.
>
> We basically have, for each of these build scenarios, to take the mmio
> clock used by sched_clock and use it through
> kernel/trace/trace-clock-32-to-64 to extend it to 64-bits. Therefore we
> won't suffer from any of the constrains linked to cnt32_to_63 and we
> would be sure that the trace clock is correct wrt SMP wrt memory
> barriers and cache line bouncing because it uses per-cpu data to keep
> the counters.
Just remember that MMIO clock sources are not available until after
setup_arch() has finished - in other words, they don't work when the
kernel initially boots. Accessing them too early will cause a page
fault and hang the kernel.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists