linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] UDF tree fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:01:01 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tibor.tajti@...il.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] UDF tree fixes

On Sun 30-11-08 12:58:54, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Jan Kara wrote:
> > 
> >   would you please pull from
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-udf-2.6.git for_linus
> > 
> >   to get the following fix:
> > Jan Kara (1):
> >       udf: Fix BUG_ON() in destroy_inode()
> > 
> >   with diffstat:
> > 
> >  fs/buffer.c    |    1 +
> >  fs/udf/inode.c |    1 +
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> Hmm. I really think you should use 'clear_inode()' rather than calling 
> invalidate_inode_buffers() directly.
  Yes, I would like to do it as well. But as I write in the changelog,
currently there's no good callback for that (I've mailed about it at
linux-fsdevel and noone had a better idea either). So for now I've just
used this kludge to silence the Oops.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/