[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4933F9A1.6080106@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:50:09 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] make get_scan_ratio() to memcg safe
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Currently, get_scan_ratio() always calculate the balancing value for global reclaim and
> memcg reclaim doesn't use it.
> Therefore it doesn't have scan_global_lru() condition.
>
> However, we plan to expand get_scan_ratio() to be usable for memcg too, latter.
> Then, The dependency code of global reclaim in the get_scan_ratio() insert into
> scan_global_lru() condision explictly.
>
>
> this patch doesn't have any functional change.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Good in principle, though of course this particular corner
case is not going to change when reclaiming a memcg :)
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists