[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081201165908.GC12816@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:59:08 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
CC: avi@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, weidong.han@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
mingo@...hat.com, amit.shah@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] add frontend implementation for the IOMMU API
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 12:58:29AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:33:11 +0200
> Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > Hmm, is there any hardware IOMMU with which we can't emulate domains by
> > > partitioning the IO address space? This concept works for GART and
> > > Calgary.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Is partitioning secure? Domain X's user could program its hardware to
> > dma to domain Y's addresses, zapping away Domain Y's user's memory.
>
> It can't be secure. So what's the point to emulate the domain
> partitioning in many traditional hardware IOMMUs that doesn't support
> it.
Its a generic way to make non-contiguous host memory io-contiguous. I
already pointed out some potential users for this.
--
| AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Operating | Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
System | Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
Research | General Partner authorized to represent:
Center | AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
| General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists