[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0812011210030.3256@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:12:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
greg@...ah.com, adobriyan@...il.com, remi.colinet@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH] Add /proc/mempool to display mempool usage
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> Hmm, I thought Documentation/ABI/ was supposed to tell us what's an
> ABI you can depend on and what's not. I mean, you shouldn't be
> depending on anything but the interfaces documented in
> Documentation/ABI/stable/, no?
Who is the f*cking MORON that thinks that "documentation" has any meaning
what-so-ever?
The fact that something is documented (whether correctly or not) has
absolutely _zero_ impact on anything at all. What makes something an ABI
is that it's useful and available. The only way something isn't an ABI is
by _explicitly_ making sure that it's not available even by mistake in a
stable form for binary use.
Example: kernel internal data structures and function calls. We make sure
that you simply _cannot_ make a binary that works across kernel versions.
That is the only way for an ABI to not form.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists