lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:24:38 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, gene.heskett@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: evict streaming IO first

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:06:42 -0500
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:

> Count the insertion of new pages in the statistics used to drive the
> pageout scanning code.  This should help the kernel quickly evict
> streaming file IO.
> 
> We count on the fact that new file pages start on the inactive file
> LRU and new anonymous pages start on the active anon list.  This
> means streaming file IO will increment the recent scanned file
> statistic, while leaving the recent rotated file statistic alone,
> driving pageout scanning to the file LRUs.
> 
> Pageout activity does its own list manipulation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> ---
>  mm/swap.c |    7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:22:13 -0800 (PST)
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > .. or how about just considering the act of adding a new page to the LRU 
> > to be a "scan" event? IOW, "scanning" is not necessarily just an act of 
> > the VM looking for pages to free, but would be a more general "activity" 
> > meter.
> 
> Linus, this should implement your idea.  
> 
> Gene, does this patch resolve the problem for you?

Has Gene had a chance to confirm this yet?

> Index: linux-2.6.28-rc5/mm/swap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.28-rc5.orig/mm/swap.c	2008-11-16 17:47:13.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.28-rc5/mm/swap.c	2008-11-17 18:58:32.000000000 -0500
> @@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ void ____pagevec_lru_add(struct pagevec 
>  	for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(pvec); i++) {
>  		struct page *page = pvec->pages[i];
>  		struct zone *pagezone = page_zone(page);
> +		int file;
>  
>  		if (pagezone != zone) {
>  			if (zone)
> @@ -456,8 +457,12 @@ void ____pagevec_lru_add(struct pagevec 
>  		VM_BUG_ON(PageUnevictable(page));
>  		VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page));
>  		SetPageLRU(page);
> -		if (is_active_lru(lru))
> +		file = is_file_lru(lru);
> +		zone->recent_scanned[file]++;
> +		if (is_active_lru(lru)) {
>  			SetPageActive(page);
> +			zone->recent_rotated[file]++;
> +		}
>  		add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
>  	}
>  	if (zone)

Were you not able to reproduce the problem?  It looks like it'd be a
pretty simple test case to set up?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ