| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <49346212.3050102@rtr.ca> Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:15:46 -0500 From: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca> To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH: /proc/acpi/alarm: handle day-of-month wraparound on readback Len Brown wrote: > I don't have a /proc/acpi/alarm due to this: > > #if defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS) || defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS_MODULE) || > !defined(CONFIG_X86) > /* use /sys/class/rtc/rtcX/wakealarm instead; it's not ACPI-specific */ > #else > #define HAVE_ACPI_LEGACY_ALARM > #endif .. Yeah.. bit of a nuisance that. I regularly apply this patch to my own kernels: --- old/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c 2008-01-06 16:39:45.000000000 -0500 +++ linux/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c 2008-01-06 17:35:35.000000000 -0500 @@ -78,11 +78,11 @@ } #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS */ -#if defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS) || defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS_MODULE) || !defined(CONFIG_X86) +//#if defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS) || defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS_MODULE) || !defined(CONFIG_X86) /* use /sys/class/rtc/rtcX/wakealarm instead; it's not ACPI-specific */ -#else +//#else #define HAVE_ACPI_LEGACY_ALARM -#endif +//#endif #ifdef HAVE_ACPI_LEGACY_ALARM -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists