[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812020710371.9474@quilx.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 07:12:01 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] badpage: simplify page_alloc flag check+clear
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > But they are always clear on free. The checking is irrelevant.
>
> How about CHECK_PAGE_FLAGS_CLEAR_AT_FREE?
Strange name.
> The one I really disliked was "PAGE_FLAGS" for an obscure
> subset of page flags, and have got rid of that.
Good.
> > If (page->flags & (all the flags including dirty and SwapBacked))
> > zap-em.
>
> That's exactly what I did, isn't it?
Yes but you added another instance of this. Can you consolidate all the
check and clears into one?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists