linux-kernel - Re: Promise PDC20376

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:36:25 -0500
From:	"David Ellingsworth" <david@...ntd.dyndns.org>
To:	"Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	"Mikael Pettersson" <mikpe@...uu.se>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Promise PDC20376

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:50 AM, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>> A small update to this. It seems the above mentioned interrupt fails
>> somewhere around the 128GB boundary. Interrupt 13h, AH=42 uses a 64
>> bit sector address and should be capable of addressing the entire
>> drive. For a SATA controller, this limitation seems relatively
>> arbitrary. For IDE controllers, a limitation such as this is
>> apparently common.
>
> 137GB I would imagine. That is the point at which LBA48 commands must be
> used not LBA28 and presumably their BIOS code only supports old format
> commands
>

Right, with LBA28 addressing you get 2^28 sector addresses = 2^27 KiB
= 2^17 MiB = 2^7 GiB = 128 GiB which is approximately 137GB. When I
wrote 128GB I really meant 128 GiB.

Regards,

David Ellingsworth

P.S. I hate the "new" binary size notations they only cause confusion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/