linux-kernel - Re: BUG? "Call fasync() functions without the BKL" is racy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <493562B5.5020600@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:30:45 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Vitaly Mayatskikh <vmayatsk@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG? "Call fasync() functions without the BKL" is racy


> Still I'd like to see the better fix for the long term, the only (afaics)
> flag with the "side effect" is FASYNC, perhaps we can move it to (say)
> ->f_mode, but this is ugly of course and still need serialization for the
> pathes which play with FASYNC.

I wonder if we need FASYNC at all. This could be gotten implicitely by
looking at the fasync_list

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/