lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:27:59 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix broken flushing in GART nofullflush path


* Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> wrote:

> In the non-default nofullflush case the GART is only flushed when
> next_bit wraps around. But it can happen that an unmap operation unmaps
> memory which is behind the current next_bit location. If these addresses
> are reused it may result in stale GART IO/TLB entries. Fix this by
> setting the GART next_bit always behind an unmapped location.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/pci-gart_64.c |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

applied to tip/x86/iommu, thanks Joerg!

a stale iotlb should not cause any problems in this particular GART case, 
right? It might be a security leak in a security-domain enforcing iotlb 
case, but the GART is a DMA bouncing helper in essence. Can you see any 
failure mode of this bug?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ