[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081202120751.8b0226ca.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:07:51 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: roel kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Cc: sct@...hat.com, adilger@....com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext3: also fix loop in do_split()
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 04:40:42 -0500
roel kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com> wrote:
> unsigned i >= 0 is always true
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/ext3/namei.c b/fs/ext3/namei.c
> index 3e5edc9..8f5e15d 100644
> --- a/fs/ext3/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext3/namei.c
> @@ -1188,7 +1188,7 @@ static struct ext3_dir_entry_2 *do_split(handle_t *handle, struct inode *dir,
> /* Split the existing block in the middle, size-wise */
> size = 0;
> move = 0;
> - for (i = count-1; i >= 0; i--) {
> + for (i = count-1; i < count; i--) {
> /* is more than half of this entry in 2nd half of the block? */
> if (size + map[i].size/2 > blocksize/2)
> break;
A local variable called `i' should always have signed type. In fact,
it should have `int' type. Doing
unsigned i;
is an act of insane vandalism, punishable by spending five additional
years coding in fortran.
I suggest you fix this by giving `i' the type God intended, or by
making it unsigned and then renaming it to something which is not
intended to trick programmers and reviewers.
Sheesh.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists