[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0812011933050.3256@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 19:42:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
Subject: Re: Regression from 2.6.26: Hibernation (possibly suspend) broken
on Toshiba R500 (bisected)
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> or something like that. And then we just need to figure out which setup
> routine sets the wrong alignment flag,.
Oh, btw, one more thing: since it apparently sometimes _does_ resume
from hibernation without all this, I'd also like to see the actual
differences in /proc/ioports and /proc/iomem that happen as a result of
the different alignment.
I also really suspect we should add a whole "alignment" field to "struct
resource", instead of the size-vs-start flags. The fact is, some PCI
devices have alignment that is neither tied to size or anything else: I
think some PCI bus resources are really always 4kB-aligned, for example
(and aligning them by size will give a bigger alignment than actually
required).
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists