[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081201.161418.51389602.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:14:18 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jengelh@...ozas.de
Cc: john.haxby@...cle.com, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sg_set_page not usable for .bss?
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:13:34 +0100 (CET)
>
> On Tuesday 2008-12-02 01:10, David Miller wrote:
> >> On Monday 2008-12-01 23:02, John Haxby wrote:
> >> >>>+ sg_init_table(sg, 2);
> >> >>>+ sg_set_buf(&sg[0], data, n);
> >> >>>+ strcpy(digest_password, sysrq_password);
> >> >>>+ i = strlen(digest_password);
> >> >>>+ sg_set_buf(&sg[1], digest_password, i);
> >> >>
> >> >> Could we directly use sysrq_password instead of copying it to
> >> >> digest_password first?
> >> >
> >> > No :-) Eventually I discovered the reason my code wasn't working
> >> > boils down to the definition of sg_set_buf:
> >> >
> >> > sg_set_page(sg, virt_to_page(buf), buflen, offset_in_page(buf))
> >> >
> >> > which doesn't work for sysrq_password. I don't know why I'll
> >> > double check.
> >>
> >> Well, sysrq_password is in the .bss section, where as digest_password
> >> is on the heap due to being kmalloc'ed. Maybe that makes a difference?
> >> Someone more versed with the virtual memory layer might know.
> >
> >You can't use these interfaces on kernel image addresses.
> >
> Great :-) So what is the best way to use the SHA1 crypto algo
> with in-kernel addresses?
kmalloc and copy it there, or something like that, you just
can't use in-kernel addresses, ever.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists