[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081201224739.958b3942.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 22:47:39 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] cpumask: switch over to
cpu_online/possible/active/present_mask: core
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 18:47:38 +1030 Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> + * cpu_active_mask - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu available to migration
I completely missed the addition of cpu_active :(
It isn't completely clear to me why this exists. Are the various state
transitions documeted anywhere?
<looks at the changelog>
It says "This is based on Linus' idea of ...", but it doesn't actually
describe that idea. bah.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists