[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081201.225529.137617862.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:55:29 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jengelh@...ozas.de
Cc: john.haxby@...cle.com, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sg_set_page not usable for .bss?
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 02:41:02 +0100 (CET)
>
> On Tuesday 2008-12-02 01:14, David Miller wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Well, sysrq_password is in the .bss section, where as digest_password
> >> >> is on the heap due to being kmalloc'ed. Maybe that makes a difference?
> >> >> Someone more versed with the virtual memory layer might know.
> >> >
> >> >You can't use these interfaces on kernel image addresses.
> >> >
> >> Great :-) So what is the best way to use the SHA1 crypto algo
> >> with in-kernel addresses?
> >
> >kmalloc and copy it there, or something like that, you just
> >can't use in-kernel addresses, ever.
> >
> Yes, kmalloc is already used. But then, what sort of address
> does kmalloc return, if not an address within kernelspace?
> (usually >=0xc0000000 on standard i386)
I said "kernel image" addresses are a problem, not "kernel space."
And by "kernel image" I mean addresses within the confines defined
by the sections of the vmlinux binary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists