[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081203081151.GE21006@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:11:51 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ftrace: print real return in dumpstack for
function graph
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> This does give a funny side effect in the stack tracer output:
>
> Depth Size Location (80 entries)
> ----- ---- --------
> 0) 4144 48 save_stack_trace+0x2f/0x4d
> 1) 4096 128 ftrace_call+0x5/0x2b
> 2) 3968 16 mempool_alloc_slab+0x16/0x18
> 3) 3952 384 return_to_handler+0x0/0x73
> 4) 3568 -240 stack_trace_call+0x11d/0x209
> 5) 3808 144 return_to_handler+0x0/0x73
> 6) 3664 -128 mempool_alloc+0x4d/0xfe
> 7) 3792 128 return_to_handler+0x0/0x73
> 8) 3664 -32 scsi_sg_alloc+0x48/0x4a [scsi_mod]
>
> As you can see, the real functions are now negative. This is due
> to them not being found inside the stack.
Can we do something to output something less funny?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists