[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081203082555.GA1944@ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:25:55 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@...telmus.de>
Cc: jonsmirl@...il.com, jrm8005@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: In-kernel IR remote control support
On Tue 2008-12-02 19:00:00, Christoph Bartelmus wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> on 23 Nov 08 at 19:01, Pavel Machek wrote:
> [...]
> >>> support for the common remotes. That seems like a net plus to me, and
> >>> you can still keep the obscure ones in userland.
> >>
> >> Jon's code and the LIRC approach exclude each other. It does not make
> >> sense to have both in the kernel. There have been attempts to clean up
> >> LIRC code to be included in the kernel. The current discussion lessens my
> >> hope that this will happen anytime soon.
>
> > I don't see why we could not use Jon's code for common remotes decoded
> > mostly by hw, and your code for the obscure cases.
>
> Ok, how about this:
> there's one common point in lirc_dev where all IR timing data is handled.
> Jon's code can grab the data at this point and feed it into its state
> machine. That way there's no need to change any of the existing drivers.
> And we all work together to get this stuff ready for inclusion into the
> kernel.
Yes, that sounds sane.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists