linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/function-graph-tracer: improve duration output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812030821050.29045@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Dec 2008 08:21:28 -0500 (EST)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/function-graph-tracer: improve duration
 output


On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Fr?d?ric Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> 
> I proposed a solution for ftrace_printk (which I planned to implement
> this evening).
> Since we are in a C-style output, that would be good  to put the ftrace_printk
> as /* C comments */ inside just below the function that called it.
> Like this:
> 
> func_that_called_ftrace_printk {
>     /* Message from ftrace_printk */
> }
> 
> This way we keep the idea of comment which comes along the role of
> ftrace_printk and we know
> which function called it, at which depth.....
> 
> Do you like it this way?

Yes definitely. I thought we already decided to do it that way ;-)

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/