| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:36:55 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] memcg: make zone_reclaim_stat
* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> [2008-12-01 21:17:44]:
> introduce mem_cgroup_per_zone::reclaim_stat member and its statics collecting
> function.
>
> Now, get_scan_ratio() can calculate correct value although memcg reclaim.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> mm/memcontrol.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/swap.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> mm/vmscan.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
> 4 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> ===================================================================
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -95,6 +95,10 @@ int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(stru
> unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> struct zone *zone,
> enum lru_list lru);
> +struct zone_reclaim_stat *mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> + struct zone *zone);
> +struct zone_reclaim_stat*
> +mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_by_page(struct page *page);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP
> extern int do_swap_account;
> @@ -261,6 +265,18 @@ mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages(struct mem_cgro
> }
>
>
> +static inline struct zone_reclaim_stat*
> +mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct zone_reclaim_stat*
> +mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_by_page(struct page *page)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_CONT */
>
> #endif /* _LINUX_MEMCONTROL_H */
> Index: b/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone {
> */
> struct list_head lists[NR_LRU_LISTS];
> unsigned long count[NR_LRU_LISTS];
> +
> + struct zone_reclaim_stat reclaim_stat;
> };
> /* Macro for accessing counter */
> #define MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, idx) ((mz)->count[(idx)])
> @@ -458,6 +460,27 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages(s
> return MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru);
> }
>
> +struct zone_reclaim_stat *mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> + struct zone *zone)
> +{
> + int nid = zone->zone_pgdat->node_id;
> + int zid = zone_idx(zone);
> + struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(memcg, nid, zid);
> +
> + return &mz->reclaim_stat;
> +}
> +
> +struct zone_reclaim_stat *mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_by_page(struct page *page)
> +{
I would prefer to use stat_from_page instead of stat_by_page, by page
is confusing.
> + struct page_cgroup *pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> + struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
> +
> + if (!mz)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return &mz->reclaim_stat;
> +}
> +
> unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> struct list_head *dst,
> unsigned long *scanned, int order,
> Index: b/mm/swap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/mm/swap.c
> +++ b/mm/swap.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ void activate_page(struct page *page)
> {
> struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = &zone->reclaim_stat;
> + struct zone_reclaim_stat *memcg_reclaim_stat;
>
> spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
> @@ -172,6 +173,12 @@ void activate_page(struct page *page)
>
> reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[!!file]++;
> reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[!!file]++;
> +
> + memcg_reclaim_stat = mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_by_page(page);
> + if (memcg_reclaim_stat) {
> + memcg_reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[!!file]++;
> + memcg_reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[!!file]++;
> + }
Does it make sense to write two inline routines like
update_recent_rotated(page)
{
zone = page_zone(page);
zone->reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[!!file]++;
mem_reclaim_stat = mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_by_page(page);
if (mem_reclaim_stat)
mem_cg_reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[!!file]++;
...
}
and similarly update_recent_reclaimed(page)
> }
> spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> }
> @@ -400,6 +407,7 @@ void ____pagevec_lru_add(struct pagevec
> int i;
> struct zone *zone = NULL;
> struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = NULL;
> + struct zone_reclaim_stat *memcg_reclaim_stat = NULL;
>
> VM_BUG_ON(is_unevictable_lru(lru));
>
> @@ -413,6 +421,8 @@ void ____pagevec_lru_add(struct pagevec
> spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> zone = pagezone;
> reclaim_stat = &zone->reclaim_stat;
> + memcg_reclaim_stat =
> + mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_by_page(page);
> spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> }
> VM_BUG_ON(PageActive(page));
> @@ -421,9 +431,13 @@ void ____pagevec_lru_add(struct pagevec
> SetPageLRU(page);
> file = is_file_lru(lru);
> reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[file]++;
> + if (memcg_reclaim_stat)
> + memcg_reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[file]++;
> if (is_active_lru(lru)) {
> SetPageActive(page);
> reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[file]++;
> + if (memcg_reclaim_stat)
> + memcg_reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[file]++;
> }
> add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
> }
> Index: b/mm/vmscan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
> static struct zone_reclaim_stat *get_reclaim_stat(struct zone *zone,
> struct scan_control *sc)
> {
> + if (!scan_global_lru(sc))
> + mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat(sc->mem_cgroup, zone);
What do we gain by just calling mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat? Where do
we return/use this value?
> +
> return &zone->reclaim_stat;
> }
>
> @@ -1141,17 +1144,14 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_lis
> __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON,
> -count[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON]);
>
> - if (scan_global_lru(sc)) {
> + if (scan_global_lru(sc))
> zone->pages_scanned += nr_scan;
> - reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[0] +=
> - count[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON];
> - reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[0] +=
> - count[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON];
> - reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[1] +=
> - count[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE];
> - reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[1] +=
> - count[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE];
> - }
> +
> + reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[0] += count[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON];
> + reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[0] += count[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON];
> + reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[1] += count[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE];
> + reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[1] += count[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE];
> +
> spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
>
> nr_scanned += nr_scan;
> @@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_lis
> SetPageLRU(page);
> lru = page_lru(page);
> add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
> - if (PageActive(page) && scan_global_lru(sc)) {
> + if (PageActive(page)) {
> int file = !!page_is_file_cache(page);
> reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[file]++;
> }
> @@ -1289,8 +1289,8 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned
> */
> if (scan_global_lru(sc)) {
> zone->pages_scanned += pgscanned;
> - reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[!!file] += pgmoved;
> }
> + reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[!!file] += pgmoved;
>
> if (file)
> __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE, -pgmoved);
> @@ -1323,8 +1323,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned
> * This helps balance scan pressure between file and anonymous
> * pages in get_scan_ratio.
> */
> - if (scan_global_lru(sc))
> - reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[!!file] += pgmoved;
> + reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[!!file] += pgmoved;
>
> /*
> * Move the pages to the [file or anon] inactive list.
>
>
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists