[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1228323355.2971.259.camel@nimitz>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:55:54 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] integrity: IMA as an integrity service provider
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 08:03 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 03:35:25PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > If you're looking for another way to split your patch out, you could
> > just stick use inode->integrity for the first patch, then introduce your
> > radix-tree in a subsequent patch. It would be functionally fine, and
> > more clearly separate out the ideas.
>
> This was done earlier and is a really bad thing for review. Just as the
> breakout happening in this round.
If Christoph and I tell you conflicting things, it goes without saying
to listen to Christoph. :)
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists