linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ftrace: graph of a single function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081203130859.fcf5a51e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:08:59 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, fweisbec@...il.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, arjan@...radead.org, dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, serue@...ibm.com, srostedt@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ftrace: graph of a single function

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:36:57 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> +static struct seq_operations ftrace_graph_seq_ops = {
> +	.start = g_start,
> +	.next = g_next,
> +	.stop = g_stop,
> +	.show = g_show,
> +};

This could be static I think.

It's probably not worth even commenting on or fixing this sort
of thing.  Just rely on someone(tm) doing periodic sweeps to
fix them all up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/