[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c62985530812031533w1b90f423lcae013b96dfe8ba9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 00:33:00 +0100
From: "Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@...tmail.fm>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Tim Bird" <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/function-branch-tracer: support for x86-64
2008/12/3 Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>:
> Hi Frederic,
>
> The changes to entry_64.S look simple enough. The order of
> saving the registers on the stack is not important in any
> way, right?
>[...]
No they don't matter.
All arguments should be saved on ftrace_graph_caller to not loose them
on call entry hooking.
On return (return_to_handler), I thought that I only needed to save
%rax (return value), the other scratch registers shouldn't matter at
the return state and the others will be saved by the return hooker.
But when I only save %rax, my system crashes. I don't know why so I
kept saving all scratch registers.
> I think this can be done with:
>
> _ASM_EXTABLE(1b,3b)
> _ASM_EXTABLE(2b,3b)
>
> (from: arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h)
Thanks. That and the generic move have actually been implemented by
Steven very recently:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/2/280
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists