linux-kernel - Re: Yet more ARM breakage in linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081203154629.bba4e5e4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:46:29 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: Yet more ARM breakage in linux-next

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:37:44 -0800
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:

> > (Yes, classic useless kerneldoc documentation doesn't actually *say* 
> > this clearly).
>  
> oh fud.  That's not a fault of kernel-doc, just of whoever wrote it.
> It's only as good as someone makes it.

For some reason, the act of typing in some kerneldoc makes people's
brains turn off.  Perhaps it's because "oh, I am supposed to type some
documentation here" instead of "gee, I think this code is unclear,
let's clarify that".

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/