linux-kernel - Question on SI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:03:03 -0800
From:	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Question on SI_ASYNCIO

Hi,

SI_ASYNCIO is defined in include/asm-generic/siginfo.h as:

	#define SI_ASYNCIO      -4              /* sent by AIO completion */

The negative value makes it a 'user-space' signal according to 

	#define SI_FROMUSER(siptr)      ((siptr)->si_code <= 0)
	#define SI_FROMKERNEL(siptr)    ((siptr)->si_code > 0)

But this signal is generated in the kernel async_completed() -
drivers/usb/core/devio.c

Am trying to understand why this is considered as a user-space signal ?

Isn't SI_ASYNCIO similar to SI_POLL or SI_MESGQ - both of which are
'kernel-signals' ?

POSIX.1 explicitly ignores async io. 

Thanks,

Sukadev

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/