[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081204135441.dc95ffc7.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 13:54:41 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: "wassim dagash" <wassim.dagash@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: KSWAPD Algorithm
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:51:11 +0100
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> "wassim dagash" <wassim.dagash@...il.com> writes:
>
> > Hi All,
> > Description:
> > I countered a weird problem with kswapd:
> > it runs in some infinite loop trying to swap until order 10 of zone
> > highmem is OK, While zone higmem (as I understand) has nothing to do
> > with contiguous physical memory (cause there is no 1-1 mapping) which
> > means kswapd will continue to try to balance order 10 of zone highmem
> > forever (or until someone release a very large chunk of highmem).
> > Can anyone please explain me the algorithm of kswapd and why it tries
> > to balance order 10 of zone higmem ?
>
> hugetlbfs requires large continuous mappings even in highmem
> to map 2MB pages or similar to user space.
> However order 10 seems pretty high, normally that's only order 8
> on a i386 system.
>
Reading Kosaki's explanation, it seems
- order-10 allocation occurs at ZONE_NORMAL.
- kswapd is kicked with order=10.
wakeup_kswaps(zone, 10) -> pgdat->kswapd_max_order = 10.
- kswapd(balance_pgdat()) does
if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, zone->pages_high, end_zone, 0))
all_zones_ok = 0;
And this "zone" is all zone, i.e. DMA, NORMAL, HIGHMEM.
Then, loop again,
if (!all_zones_ok) {
cond_resched();
try_to_freeze();
goto loop_again;
}
Maybe...
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists