[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200812040921.05945.elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:21:03 +0100
From: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
lenb@...nel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tiwai@...e.de, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Regression from 2.6.26: Hibernation (possibly suspend) broken on Toshiba R500 (bisected)
OOn Thursday 04 December 2008, you wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Well, in principle it may be related to the way we handle bridges
> > during resume
>
> This is a hibernate-only issue for you, right? Or is it about regular
> suspend-to-ram too?
It is regular suspend to ram.
I feel now confident in saying that with the debug patch resume from STR
is 100% reliable. And the two workarounds I was using to improve resume
reliability are no longer needed:
- unloading e1000e before suspend
- using aggressive powersave setting on snd_hda_intel to ensure that
sound controller was already sleeping before entering suspend
I don't think we have any theory yet on how those workarounds were helping
to improve things, right?
> Well, how stable has hibernate been on that particular machine
> historically?
I cannot comment on this as I have not owned this laptop long enough.
One other thing: the ohci1394 "irq 19: nobody cared" issue is definitely
unrelated as I just got one during a resume with the debug patch.
Cheers,
FJP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists