[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081204234603.b5a28cd6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:46:03 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@....com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS breakage on m68k (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3)
Hi Christoph,
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:13:30 -0500 Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 10:02:15AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Status of my local build tests will be at
> > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next . If maintainers want to give
> > > advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open to add
> > > more builds.
> >
> > On m68k (32-bit only, no compat32), XFS fails to build in linux-next:
>
> Yeah, it's broken on all 32bit platforms. Today's xfs tree has a fix
> for it.
I tried that tree but got this error from a powerpc ppc64_defconfig build
(which is 64 bit):
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c:365: error: 'xfs_file_compat_invis_ioctl' undeclared here (not in a function)
Eric mentioned that your patch "had a problem of its own", so I assumed
that was it and left it removed from today's linux-next.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists