[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812040946060.5240@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:46:28 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
containers@...ts.osdl.org,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ftrace: add ability to only trace swapper tasks
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> writes:
>
> > * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
> >>
> >> What does this patch actually do? Is swapper currently excluded from
> >> tracing for undisclosed reasons and this patch permits it to be traced?
> >> If so, why was swapper thus excluded? Or am I totally off track?
> >
> >> > +static struct pid * const ftrace_swapper_pid = (struct pid *)1;
> >>
> >> eh?
> >
> > all side-effects of getting rid of the integer based PID namespace and
> > replacing them with struct pid pointers.
>
> Thanks for asking Andrew it looks like an unnecessary side effect.
Well, it was necessary without hacking fork.c ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists