[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <804dabb00812031622j45fbdc76u5832a469a8a1d82c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:22:09 +0800
From: "Peter Teoh" <htmldeveloper@...il.com>
To: "Geoffrey McRae" <geoff@...idhost.com>
Cc: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels@...tron.nl>,
"Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Nick Andrew" <nick@...k-andrew.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New Security Features, Please Comment
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Geoffrey McRae <geoff@...idhost.com> wrote:
>
> The setuid/gid concept in linux is very limited, it would be nice to be
> able to grant programs limited use of setuid, and even go one step
> further, grant programs limited ability to set child uids.
Yes, there can be many other variation on what u have just said, eg,
adding conditions whereby the grant can be used, etc. If u have a
chance to learn a little bit of SELinux, u will know the whole thing
can be very complex, especially the rules and policies configuration.
It is a fine balance between overheads vs performance and usability.
>
> To be completly honest, this is the kind of functionallity I expected to
> already be there, and I was hopeing someone would tell me to RTFM on
> function X that already does this...
>
Yes, I am sure it exists...and more likely than not, it can be very
application specific, and therefore, will be done by the higher-end
application in userspace.
But looking beyond, is there any other OS that may have something
similar? (Windows, or OpenBSD etc?) Not sure for me.
--
Regards,
Peter Teoh
Ernest Hemingway - "Never mistake motion for action."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists