[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081204221551.GV6703@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:15:51 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi-suse@...stfloor.org>,
Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Device loses barrier support (was: Fixed patch for simple barriers.)
> If you are pushing what you are pushing --- barriers allowing to return
> EOPNOTSUPP anytime --- then asynchronous barrier submits can no longer be
> used, because by the time EOPNOTSUPP is detected, the filesystem is
> already corrupted.
Chris Mason pointed out that this can actually already happen. From
a quick review this can happen in MD raid1 at least (their barriers_work
flag is pretty similar to the DM implementation I did). So everyone
has to handle this already anyways.
> I'm wondering, where in fsync() does Linux wait for hardware disk cache to
> be flushed? Isn't there a bug that fsync() will return before the cache is
> flushed? I couldn't really find it. The last thing do_fsync calls is
> filemap_fdatawait and it doesn't do cache flush (blkdev_issue_flush).
At least in fsync() on journaling fs the metadata update should push it.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists