linux-kernel - [RFC][PATCH 0/4] cgroup ID and css refcnt change and memcg hierarchy (2008/12/05)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081205172642.565661b1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 5 Dec 2008 17:26:42 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc:	"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"lizf@...fujitsu.com" <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"menage@...gle.com" <menage@...gle.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] cgroup ID and css refcnt change and memcg
 hierarchy (2008/12/05)

This is a patch set onto mmotm-2.6.28-Dec30.

Still RFC. I'm considering whether I can make this simpler....

Major changes from previous one
	- css->refcnt is unified.
	  I think distributed refcnt is a crazy idea...
	- applied comments to previous version.
	- OOM Kill handler is fixed. (this was broken by hierarchy) 

I may not be able to reply quickly in weekend, sorry.

After this, memcg's hierarchical reclaim will be
==
static struct mem_cgroup *
mem_cgroup_select_victim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
{
        struct cgroup *cgroup, *root_cgroup;
        struct mem_cgroup *ret;
        int nextid, rootid, depth, found;

        root_cgroup = root_mem->css.cgroup;
        rootid = cgroup_id(root_cgroup);
        depth = cgroup_depth(root_cgroup);
        found = 0;

        rcu_read_lock();
        if (!root_mem->use_hierarchy) {
                spin_lock(&root_mem->reclaim_param_lock);
                root_mem->scan_age++;
                spin_unlock(&root_mem->reclaim_param_lock);
                css_get(&root_mem->css);
                ret = root_mem;
        }

        while (!ret) {
                /* ID:0 is not used by cgroup-id */
                nextid = root_mem->last_scanned_child + 1;
                cgroup = cgroup_get_next(nextid, rootid, depth, &found);
                if (cgroup) {
                        spin_lock(&root_mem->reclaim_param_lock);
                        root_mem->last_scanned_child = found;
                        spin_unlock(&root_mem->reclaim_param_lock);
                        ret = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgroup);
                        if (!css_tryget(&ret->css))
                                ret = NULL;
                } else {
                        spin_lock(&root_mem->reclaim_param_lock);
                        root_mem->scan_age++;
                        root_mem->last_scanned_child = 0;
                        spin_unlock(&root_mem->reclaim_param_lock);
                }
        }
        rcu_read_unlock();
        return ret;
}

/*
 * root_mem is the original ancestor that we've been reclaim from.
 * root_mem cannot be freed while walking because there are children.
 */
static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
                                                gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap)
{
        struct mem_cgroup *victim;
        unsigned long start_age;
        int ret = 0;
        int total = 0;

        start_age = root_mem->scan_age;
        /* allows visit twice (under this memcg, ->scan_age is shared.) */
        while (time_after((start_age + 2UL), root_mem->scan_age)) {
                victim = mem_cgroup_select_victim(root_mem);
                ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(victim,
                                gfp_mask, noswap, get_swappiness(victim));
                css_put(&victim->css);
                if (mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(root_mem))
                        return 1;
                total += ret;
        }

        ret = total;
        if (mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(root_mem))
                ret = 1;

        return ret;
}
==
This can be reused for soft-limit or something fancy featrues.


Regards,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/