[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0812041645290.3543@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 16:45:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
lenb@...nel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tiwai@...e.de, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Regression from 2.6.26: Hibernation (possibly suspend) broken
on Toshiba R500 (bisected)
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > There's a difference, though. It doesn't cause the resources flags to be
> > cleared for the cardbus bridge and the cardbus bridge gets the correct sizes
> > of both prefetchable and non-prefetchable windows (64 MB).
>
> Yes, true. In that sense, it minimizes the differences between the
> "working" and "nonworking" case.
Hmm.
One other issue: we've been looking mostly at MMIO, but another thing that
differs here is the PIO part.
Your patch only changes pbus_size_mem(), so what happens is that it avoids
allocating the prefetch window. But it still allocates the PIO window,
because pbus_size_io() is still run.
Maybe the PIO window matters? Any magic suspend registers are usually in
PIO space, not in MMIO space. Did /proc/ioports change, and if so, how?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists