[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081205100519.GA4430@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:05:19 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
eranian@...glemail.com, dada1@...mosbay.com,
robert.richter@....com, arjan@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, rostedt@...dmis.org, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] [Announcement] Performance Counters for Linux
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > > - No interaction with ptrace: any task (with sufficient permissions) can
> > > monitor other tasks, without having to stop that task.
> >
> > This isn't going to work.
> >
> > If you look at the things the perfmon libraries do, you do need to stop
> > the task.
> >
> > Consider counter virtualization as the most direct example. [...]
>
> Note that counter virtualization is not offered in the perfmon3 patchset that has
> been posted to lkml. (It is part of the much larger 'full' perfmon patchset which
> has not been submitted for integration)
>
> Nevertheless we will offer counter virtualization in -v2 of our patchset [...]
i've just implemented it. Running an (infinite-loop) hello.c with 6 counters on a
CPU that has only two counters now gives the expected:
counter[0 cycles ]: 3368245084 , delta: 842019470 events
counter[1 instructions ]: 1384678210 , delta: 346108294 events
counter[2 cache-refs ]: 659 , delta: 150 events
counter[3 cache-misses ]: 0
counter[4 branch-instructions ]: 266919398 , delta: 66731508 events
counter[5 branch-misses ]: 1201 , delta: 315 events
This will be in -v2.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists