[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081205212450.574f498c.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 21:24:50 +0900
From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp
Subject: [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 3/4] memcg: avoid dead lock caused by race
between oom and cpuset_attach
mpol_rebind_mm(), which can be called from cpuset_attach(), does down_write(mm->mmap_sem).
This means down_write(mm->mmap_sem) can be called under cgroup_mutex.
OTOH, page fault path does down_read(mm->mmap_sem) and calls mem_cgroup_try_charge_xxx(),
which may eventually calls mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(). And mem_cgroup_out_of_memory()
calls cgroup_lock().
This means cgroup_lock() can be called under down_read(mm->mmap_sem).
If those two paths race, dead lock can happen.
This patch avoid this dead lock by:
- remove cgroup_lock() from mem_cgroup_out_of_memory().
- define new mutex (memcg_tasklist) and serialize mem_cgroup_move_task()
(->attach handler of memory cgroup) and mem_cgroup_out_of_memory.
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 5 +++++
mm/oom_kill.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 9c5856b..ab04725 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ static int really_do_swap_account __initdata = 1; /* for remember boot option*/
#define do_swap_account (0)
#endif
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(memcg_tasklist); /* can be hold under cgroup_mutex */
/*
* Statistics for memory cgroup.
@@ -796,7 +797,9 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
if (!nr_retries--) {
if (oom) {
+ mutex_lock(&memcg_tasklist);
mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask);
+ mutex_unlock(&memcg_tasklist);
mem_over_limit->last_oom_jiffies = jiffies;
}
goto nomem;
@@ -2172,10 +2175,12 @@ static void mem_cgroup_move_task(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
struct cgroup *old_cont,
struct task_struct *p)
{
+ mutex_lock(&memcg_tasklist);
/*
* FIXME: It's better to move charges of this process from old
* memcg to new memcg. But it's just on TODO-List now.
*/
+ mutex_unlock(&memcg_tasklist);
}
struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys = {
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index fd150e3..40ba050 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -429,7 +429,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t gfp_mask)
unsigned long points = 0;
struct task_struct *p;
- cgroup_lock();
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
retry:
p = select_bad_process(&points, mem);
@@ -444,7 +443,6 @@ retry:
goto retry;
out:
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
- cgroup_unlock();
}
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists