linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] param: Adapt MN10300 to the new parameter handling regime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:07:23 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] param: Adapt MN10300 to the new parameter handling regime

Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:

> > With that, the core_param stuff does work for mem=...  But I object to
> > mem_override not being __initdata.  I also don't think the parameter should
> > appear in sysfs - that's just a waste of resources.
> 
> If you set the perm to 0, then it won't appear in sys, and hence can be
> __initdata.

That seemed to work.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/