[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081205133925.GA10004@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:09:26 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 1/4] memcg: don't trigger oom at page
migration
* Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp> [2008-12-05 21:23:04]:
> I think triggering OOM at mem_cgroup_prepare_migration would be just a bit
> overkill.
> Returning -ENOMEM would be enough for mem_cgroup_prepare_migration.
> The caller would handle the case anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 4dbce1d..50ee1be 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1330,7 +1330,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup **ptr)
> unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
>
> if (mem) {
> - ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, &mem);
> + ret = __mem_cgroup_try_charge(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, &mem, false);
> css_put(&mem->css);
> }
> *ptr = mem;
>
Seems reasonable to me. A comment indicating or adding a noreclaim
wrapper around __mem_cgroup_try_charge to indicate that no reclaim
will take place will be nice.
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists